On life and death and random wonderings: The first posting is always the longest

Following the case of Lester, the dog who suffered horrific burns on his body due to a cruel, cruel soul (if he has one!) who poured boiling oil on him, it seems wonderful that the dog has survived. I don't know if he is fully out of the woods yet, but the update on http://malaysiandogsdeservebetter.blogspot.com/ is positive.

I shall not rant on the cruelty of man, as that is a topic already worked to death in pet lover forums. Indeed, if wishes came true, I think that that cruel person might be already writhing in the fires of hell quite a number of times over.

Instead, to the topic of euthanasia.
Always a topic close to the heart of people, supporters and opposers tend to be quite.. passionate ... when discussing the topic. Not really a topic that many can discuss cold-bloodedly or logically really.
Personally, I still think in cases of animals who have suffered serious injuries and have a minimal chance to live, the kinder option might be to let them go. Especially in the case of strays, who also have a small chance of being rehomed. Of course, Lester has proven the will to survive, and I think that one needs to look into their eyes to see what they wish. For some, the will to survive is overwhelmingly strong against even the worst odds.

But on the other hand, there are so many other healthy strays dogs and puppies who also need a home, and food, shelter and medical treatment. Money being poured into one could have been distributed onto many instead, or be used to reduce the number of strays HUMANELY by a Neuter and Release Programme. The lower number of strays could mean less cruelty being perpetuated as there are less targets. Then again, if someones a cruel ass, they will still find ways. We can be practical and logical, but the world still needs a figurehead and examples. A world with no miracle would also be very bland indeed.

One point niggles in the whole business. Personal comments. Some people just seem to not be able to accept a different point of view, or a different opinion and option from the one they prescribe to. I think anonymous postings should not be allowed. If someone wishes to state an opinion, believe in it enough to state it openly and clearly, rather than hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. Also, perhaps to defend your views with a reasonable, thought out argument. It might prove more convincing that a single case-in-point and a 'I told you so' in a disappointingly rude manner.

Maybe that could be the topic for my next posting: Anonymity of the Internet: How far is too far?
Hehe